Saturday, June 14, 2008

Roger Patterson's Bigfoot Casts

The 1967 Patterson film of a Bigfoot has caused quite a stir in the 40+ years since its release.


A picture of Patty's foot.



These are the tracks that Patterson claimed the Bigfoot made from his famous 1967 film. Notice the toes. How smooth and perfectly shaped they are. Also notice that despite the deep impression of the foot, the only part of the toe that shows in the plaster is the round tips of the toe. No other part of the toe is seen in the deep plaster cast. This suggests that it was not made by an actual fleshly foot stepping down and putting weight down. Shouldn't the toes smoosh into each other, not maintain a perfect round form, and show more than just the tips of the toe from such a deep impression?

9 comments:

Loren Coleman said...

My response is here:

http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/skeptic-bf/

Larry Lesh said...

I agree with Loren Coleman. There is simply to much circumstantial evidence that Bigfoot is alive and well. The evidence is so great that given a forum in a court of law it could be proven.

As for the P & G film it has been examined frame by frame by Professors Grover Krantz and Jeff Meldrum among other credentialed experts. It's real, bottom line.

Mberenis said...

I like this blog because it reminds me of myself. Thanks for posting!

Search Engine for Internet Marketing
Add Url Free
6,000+ sites indexed you can advertise on for free
View by Traffic, Quality, Reach, Popularity, and more!

Anonymous said...

The film that Roger Patterson made in 1967 is real. Now I am going to tell you exactly what it was that he filmed. Long before Jesus was born there were thousands of slaves who ran off around the world and started their own countries. When these slaves left there was a large group of men who took off and ended up in Africa. Some of these men caught female Orangutans and took them over to South America and had sex with them and created the American Indian. The men who stayed in Africa caught female Gorillas and had sex with them and created the Black man. When scientists found the bones they thought we evolved from a female Chimpanzee. But it wasn't a natural evolution it was a man made evolution. That's where Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Yeti, Orangutan man and the Skunk Ape comes from. They are half man and half Gorilla and half man and half Orangutan. They use to call the American Indian the red man. The Orangutan has redish or orangish hair. When their hair came out the Indian's skin remained red. The Gorilla has black skin and black hair. When the hair came out the Black man ended up with black skin. They are not prehistoric creatures from millions of years ago but man made creatures from a few thousand years ago. The creature that Roger Patterson filmed was half man and half Gorilla.

Anonymous said...

Evolution taken to it's logical conclusion always equals racism....anyways I was just on this website www.pattersonfilm.com nothing but Patterson bigfoot stuff. There is a really cool section they have discussing the influence of the Patterson film on American pop culture. Interesting debate on the authenticity, both pro and cons. It basically stated that people can't replicate the footage even today.

Anonymous said...

great article, I was just reading about this debate on the Patterson bigfoot at http:/www.pattersonfilm.com it has some unique perspectives, both pro monkeysuit, and pro bigfoot. I personally think its odd that we still cant simulate this film even close. 40 years later with the advances in costume making and technology. that is my opinion.

AUDIOFEEL said...

Hi cool blog but i got one question which frame from the movie is this pic http://bp1.blogger.com/_LySX85wRIzU/SFQjwOi_lDI/AAAAAAAAAAc/sr2H2J1uVXc/s1600-h/patty2.jpg

???? I cant find it

Anonymous said...

I found this site on the pattersonfilm.com site on his missing link page that there is a man called Leroy Blevins that debunked the film. On his site you can see more on the Patterson film then the pattersonfilm.com he shows both reel1 and parts of reel2 and he even made a copy of the Patterson Bigfoot suit. This is the best site I even seen on the Patterson and Gimlin Bigfoot film. There is no where on this site he claims to debunked the film he just analyze the film and show what he found in it. here is that site www.freewebs.com/pgfilmanalyze
everything he found in the film he shows that part of the film. he even show the cast prints next to the feet of the Bigfoot and you can see they are two different feet. he even shows there was other men at the film site with Patterson and Gimlin take a look

Anonymous said...

The first Europeans that saw the Africans said that some of the African women had genitals that resembled that of a gorilla. If you look at the nose of an African you will notice that it is wide like the gorilla's nose. So Bigfoot and the Orangutan creatures came from men that had sex with female gorillas and orangutans. It was a man made evolution. I am only stating the facts. I am an observer and that's all. The creature that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed in 1967 was real. It was half man and half gorilla. Bigfoot was not a man in a costume, not our missing link and not a figment of our imagination. Bigfoot is a man made creature.