BFRO, claims that the above is a bigfoot. Despite all of the evidence that it is in fact a mangy bear, BFRO insists that it is a bigfoot. Look at the picture below and notice the two eyes, and then your mind can make out a bear face, not a bigfoot/primate face.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
The one photo of three that you selected could be, if you look at it just right (in an optical illusion sort of way), ALMOST look like a bear.
That's one photo. How does this one 'appear' to be a bear?
The light up eyes you have added are too far apart for a bear that size. Just as others have said, I did a comparison and they're way off. This one is either a primate or a major hoax. Why else would they post pictures of bears with it from the begining if they didn't want to give you that sense of doubt? The bear/squatch argument is what made this sighting popular. The proportions are not the same as a bear. If it was a hoax it was brilliantly done.
2 comments:
The one photo of three that you selected could be, if you look at it just right (in an optical illusion sort of way), ALMOST look like a bear.
That's one photo. How does this one 'appear' to be a bear?
http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos_creature_image_1.asp
The light up eyes you have added are too far apart for a bear that size. Just as others have said, I did a comparison and they're way off. This one is either a primate or a major hoax. Why else would they post pictures of bears with it from the begining if they didn't want to give you that sense of doubt? The bear/squatch argument is what made this sighting popular. The proportions are not the same as a bear. If it was a hoax it was brilliantly done.
Post a Comment